Concept-groups are handy not in analysis, which by in itself narrows rather than expand understanding, and logical atomism meanwhile is in ignorance the nature of comprehension of concepts, whose totality of comprehension is tied with the interrelationship of concept-groups within them, and this relationship specifies their consequences or results of their accidental essentials together with their interaction within an act of comprehension/judgment/definition/description of an event-action of the objects explained.
So, concerning the judgment of a person, to talk about who is a person, how can someone really determine the definition of a certain person, nobody can really be in the position to judge a whole person’s being just with the experiencing of the actions of that person, even that would define him or her at that moment.
Described under the light of Synthetic Atomization, the total definition of a person is to take into account his or her whole life, the summation of his or her actions and his or her relationship or non-relationship within the milieu. We may try to simplify with the definitions that man is a rational animal, a social animal, a person who did something or that something, but from an eagle’s vantage point, that is not a complete definition/description of a person, deep within ourselves we know that we could not exhaust the knowledge of a person in just a few sentences. The whole life of a person, from birth to death, would constitute the WHOLE DEFINITION OF THAT PERSON, and still, nobody can ever know each and every interaction that person has with others, or with the environment. Again, here synthetic atomization underscores man’s infinite ignorance about another person’s totality, though has a finiteness, is still beyond a person’s comprehension, memory, and knowing, such that sometimes religious people infer an infinite intelligence or Supreme Being that would KNOW a whole person’s life so that there would be SOMEONE who would have a complete definition of a person.
However, despite the voluminous obligation Synthetic Atomization imposes on its application of the definition of a person, a person’s actions meanwhile would be easily judged based on the consequences of his or her actions and its immediate results on others or on objects. This is where Atomization occurs, the result of the act, or the end result of an interaction between objects, would be the atom that unites the actors within the event or reaction between persons and their actions, and that would facilitate judgment of a logical exercise upon a statement or event in time. That judgment is another addition to the synthetic description of an object/person/term’s definition, but their involvement is atomized by their specific effect in that moment in time that would provide direction for perception, awareness, and judgment, for direction is presupposed by the finiteness, or atomization of concepts involved, the melding of concept-groups into a singular concept-group, i.e., the result or consequence.
Thus, a criminal behind bars, convicted justly and within legal bounds of his/her milieu, is adjudged as such for the action committed against humanity, against society. That is the atomization of the action, the doer, the recipient of the action, the time it occurred, how it was done, into the end result: being behind bars, and something more simplified for judgment, that is, bad, as far as the limitation imposed on the felon on freedom and reputation. Nobody would know if he/she would reform, become a saint, what subsequent actions and interactions would occur involving the convict within prison, all of which would comprise his/her the synthesis of being, the totality of existence up to the time of death, the endpoint of existence in the material sense. However, when the judgment is made to bear on a consequence of an action that impinges on the duty of society to take action, then, he or she would be atomized together with others in another exercise of judgment, the conclusion of a logical exercise.
Synthetic Atomization has many applications in the field of logic and philosophizing so much so that it would be the restatement of the obvious as pointed out by prior movements of literature and philosophy, however, delineation of the lines of thought and logical actions would clarify more than obfuscate more than the abstractions offered by logical atomism and idealism that many ideologies have offered earlier generations of credulous students.
Navarro’s Synthetic Atomization: Expanded and Clarified
{ September 7, 2009 @ 11:11 am } · { Logic and Philosophizing, Metaphysics, Personal Notes, Philosophy, Psychology, Social Commentary, Writing, thoughts }
{ Tags: Layman's Philosophy, logic, new theory of philosophy, philosophizing, secular thinking, Structuralism, Synthetic Atomization, thought structuralization } · { Leave a Comment }
The philosophy and logical exercise of Synthetic Atomization is actually experienced and practiced by our common reasoning. However, its discernment and determination of its logical structuralization is productive in such a way that principles of thinking are formed that would positively structure our thinking.
1) Its logical structure that leads to a path of reason is summarized this way: object/action + object/action (one of the infinite syntheses)= consequence/result (atomization of synthesis).
The addends could further be expounded or expanded to action/reaction/potential of object/subject +(interaction/combination) action/reaction/potential of an object/subject = consequence/result(unique to that synthesis).
This theory of philosophy is my reaction to Russell’s Logical Atomism such that, synthetically defining/describing/expanding its boundaries requires contrasting it to the search of logical atoms, which is an exercise in futility.
Terms, even up to its simplified form signifying evident/obvous signification cannot be atoms since their definitions vary with interaction and non-interaction with other terms. Instead, they become subatomic particles to synthetic atomization of concept-groups. That is such that a simple sentence like ‘boy eats fruit’ cannot be treated as separate atoms because their interaction produces a much greater atom = a good result/consequence = good; a bad result/ consequence = bad.
The term ‘boy’ is a concept-group in itself: young, human, higher-form of life/creature, male, etc.), which rather becomes the subatomic particle of the synthetic definition of itself in that peculiarity/incidental synthesis/sentence. ‘Fruit’, despite being unspecified, is also a concept-group (organic, consumable, full of vitamins, etc.). The statement is only one of the infinite synthetic de-finitions of the terms ‘boy’ and ‘fruit’, however, that statement, and the understood result melds the concept-groups into subatomic logical particles into a synthetic atomization, as the combination falls into a good/bad result/consequence. This is also entirely dependent on how their reality or the reality of the statement affects the perceiver. Subjectivity bears heavily on synthetic atomization. However, consequences/results weighed against a real standard, i.e., physical laws, natural laws, legal bases, atomizes the concept-groups into a singular, consistent judgment of such an interaction of elements which is within the moment of infinite synthesis.
2) Thus, the philosophy of Synthetic Atomization holds that there are infinite permutations of the meanings added to any concept/subject/term, because with every occurence of these terms in synthesis, their meaning is accumulated, and the number of possible combinations of these terms with others are infinite, the total knowledge of which man is infinitely ignorant. This is encapsulated in the phrase, synthesis of meanings and states of existence, or synthetic being..
However, from the infinity of meanings and beings of a term or subject, they become atomized by the end-result of its interaction/reaction with another term or terms, an event that could be grasped by the finite knowledge of man affected by such an interaction, being atomized by that peculiar combination of terms (peculiarity/ unique synthesis), thus forming a macro concept-group melded into a good/bad consequence/resulet. This is summarized in the term atomization through consequence or atomization..
Working through a consequential path of reasoning is of course I admit, empiricism or pragmatism, but it would be a disservice to the annals of philosophical thinking not to point out such a theory of philosophy, which is a lot closer to the way people think. By making evident these logical structures, the philosopher or logician is provided another facet of the truth in reasoning. Such abstractions such as logical atomism or even idealism would be the haunt of those temporarily rejecting reality out of fashion.
3) The tenets of this theory of philosophy grounds human thinking on the truth of the limitations of human knowing but also holds the awareness such that it faces the consequence of the interaction within a peculiarity happening with such and such elements/concept-groups in a particular moment in time, thus clarifying and giving direction to actual thinking. We should note that direction is presupposed by limited pathways within an infinite possibility of definitions and combinations of elements.
Application of Synthetic Atomization to concepts and logical conclusions, still being atomized synthetically and soon to be Pressed.