The philosophy and logical exercise of Synthetic Atomization is actually experienced and practiced by our common reasoning. However, its discernment and determination of its logical structuralization is productive in such a way that principles of thinking are formed that would positively structure our thinking.
1) Its logical structure that leads to a path of reason is summarized this way: object/action + object/action (one of the infinite syntheses)= consequence/result (atomization of synthesis).
The addends could further be expounded or expanded to action/reaction/potential of object/subject +(interaction/combination) action/reaction/potential of an object/subject = consequence/result(unique to that synthesis).
This theory of philosophy is my reaction to Russell’s Logical Atomism such that, synthetically defining/describing/expanding its boundaries requires contrasting it to the search of logical atoms, which is an exercise in futility.
Terms, even up to its simplified form signifying evident/obvous signification cannot be atoms since their definitions vary with interaction and non-interaction with other terms. Instead, they become subatomic particles to synthetic atomization of concept-groups. That is such that a simple sentence like ‘boy eats fruit’ cannot be treated as separate atoms because their interaction produces a much greater atom = a good result/consequence = good; a bad result/ consequence = bad.
The term ‘boy’ is a concept-group in itself: young, human, higher-form of life/creature, male, etc.), which rather becomes the subatomic particle of the synthetic definition of itself in that peculiarity/incidental synthesis/sentence. ‘Fruit’, despite being unspecified, is also a concept-group (organic, consumable, full of vitamins, etc.). The statement is only one of the infinite synthetic de-finitions of the terms ‘boy’ and ‘fruit’, however, that statement, and the understood result melds the concept-groups into subatomic logical particles into a synthetic atomization, as the combination falls into a good/bad result/consequence. This is also entirely dependent on how their reality or the reality of the statement affects the perceiver. Subjectivity bears heavily on synthetic atomization. However, consequences/results weighed against a real standard, i.e., physical laws, natural laws, legal bases, atomizes the concept-groups into a singular, consistent judgment of such an interaction of elements which is within the moment of infinite synthesis.
2) Thus, the philosophy of Synthetic Atomization holds that there are infinite permutations of the meanings added to any concept/subject/term, because with every occurence of these terms in synthesis, their meaning is accumulated, and the number of possible combinations of these terms with others are infinite, the total knowledge of which man is infinitely ignorant. This is encapsulated in the phrase, synthesis of meanings and states of existence, or synthetic being..
However, from the infinity of meanings and beings of a term or subject, they become atomized by the end-result of its interaction/reaction with another term or terms, an event that could be grasped by the finite knowledge of man affected by such an interaction, being atomized by that peculiar combination of terms (peculiarity/ unique synthesis), thus forming a macro concept-group melded into a good/bad consequence/resulet. This is summarized in the term atomization through consequence or atomization..
Working through a consequential path of reasoning is of course I admit, empiricism or pragmatism, but it would be a disservice to the annals of philosophical thinking not to point out such a theory of philosophy, which is a lot closer to the way people think. By making evident these logical structures, the philosopher or logician is provided another facet of the truth in reasoning. Such abstractions such as logical atomism or even idealism would be the haunt of those temporarily rejecting reality out of fashion.
3) The tenets of this theory of philosophy grounds human thinking on the truth of the limitations of human knowing but also holds the awareness such that it faces the consequence of the interaction within a peculiarity happening with such and such elements/concept-groups in a particular moment in time, thus clarifying and giving direction to actual thinking. We should note that direction is presupposed by limited pathways within an infinite possibility of definitions and combinations of elements.
Application of Synthetic Atomization to concepts and logical conclusions, still being atomized synthetically and soon to be Pressed.
September 7, 2009 • 11:11 am 0
Navarro’s Synthetic Atomization: Expanded and Clarified
The philosophy and logical exercise of Synthetic Atomization is actually experienced and practiced by our common reasoning. However, its discernment and determination of its logical structuralization is productive in such a way that principles of thinking are formed that would positively structure our thinking.
1) Its logical structure that leads to a path of reason is summarized this way: object/action + object/action (one of the infinite syntheses)= consequence/result (atomization of synthesis).
The addends could further be expounded or expanded to action/reaction/potential of object/subject +(interaction/combination) action/reaction/potential of an object/subject = consequence/result(unique to that synthesis).
This theory of philosophy is my reaction to Russell’s Logical Atomism such that, synthetically defining/describing/expanding its boundaries requires contrasting it to the search of logical atoms, which is an exercise in futility.
Terms, even up to its simplified form signifying evident/obvous signification cannot be atoms since their definitions vary with interaction and non-interaction with other terms. Instead, they become subatomic particles to synthetic atomization of concept-groups. That is such that a simple sentence like ‘boy eats fruit’ cannot be treated as separate atoms because their interaction produces a much greater atom = a good result/consequence = good; a bad result/ consequence = bad.
The term ‘boy’ is a concept-group in itself: young, human, higher-form of life/creature, male, etc.), which rather becomes the subatomic particle of the synthetic definition of itself in that peculiarity/incidental synthesis/sentence. ‘Fruit’, despite being unspecified, is also a concept-group (organic, consumable, full of vitamins, etc.). The statement is only one of the infinite synthetic de-finitions of the terms ‘boy’ and ‘fruit’, however, that statement, and the understood result melds the concept-groups into subatomic logical particles into a synthetic atomization, as the combination falls into a good/bad result/consequence. This is also entirely dependent on how their reality or the reality of the statement affects the perceiver. Subjectivity bears heavily on synthetic atomization. However, consequences/results weighed against a real standard, i.e., physical laws, natural laws, legal bases, atomizes the concept-groups into a singular, consistent judgment of such an interaction of elements which is within the moment of infinite synthesis.
2) Thus, the philosophy of Synthetic Atomization holds that there are infinite permutations of the meanings added to any concept/subject/term, because with every occurence of these terms in synthesis, their meaning is accumulated, and the number of possible combinations of these terms with others are infinite, the total knowledge of which man is infinitely ignorant. This is encapsulated in the phrase, synthesis of meanings and states of existence, or synthetic being..
However, from the infinity of meanings and beings of a term or subject, they become atomized by the end-result of its interaction/reaction with another term or terms, an event that could be grasped by the finite knowledge of man affected by such an interaction, being atomized by that peculiar combination of terms (peculiarity/ unique synthesis), thus forming a macro concept-group melded into a good/bad consequence/resulet. This is summarized in the term atomization through consequence or atomization..
Working through a consequential path of reasoning is of course I admit, empiricism or pragmatism, but it would be a disservice to the annals of philosophical thinking not to point out such a theory of philosophy, which is a lot closer to the way people think. By making evident these logical structures, the philosopher or logician is provided another facet of the truth in reasoning. Such abstractions such as logical atomism or even idealism would be the haunt of those temporarily rejecting reality out of fashion.
3) The tenets of this theory of philosophy grounds human thinking on the truth of the limitations of human knowing but also holds the awareness such that it faces the consequence of the interaction within a peculiarity happening with such and such elements/concept-groups in a particular moment in time, thus clarifying and giving direction to actual thinking. We should note that direction is presupposed by limited pathways within an infinite possibility of definitions and combinations of elements.
Application of Synthetic Atomization to concepts and logical conclusions, still being atomized synthetically and soon to be Pressed.
Filed under: Logic and Philosophizing, Metaphysics, Personal Notes, Philosophy, Psychology, Social Commentary, Writing, thoughts , Layman's Philosophy, logic, new theory of philosophy, philosophizing, secular thinking, Structuralism, Synthetic Atomization, thought structuralization