Concept-groups are handy not in analysis, which by in itself narrows rather than expand understanding, and logical atomism meanwhile is in ignorance the nature of comprehension of concepts, whose totality of comprehension is tied with the interrelationship of concept-groups within them, and this relationship specifies their consequences or results of their accidental essentials together with their interaction within an act of comprehension/judgment/definition/description of an event-action of the objects explained.
So, concerning the judgment of a person, to talk about who is a person, how can someone really determine the definition of a certain person, nobody can really be in the position to judge a whole person’s being just with the experiencing of the actions of that person, even that would define him or her at that moment.
Described under the light of Synthetic Atomization, the total definition of a person is to take into account his or her whole life, the summation of his or her actions and his or her relationship or non-relationship within the milieu. We may try to simplify with the definitions that man is a rational animal, a social animal, a person who did something or that something, but from an eagle’s vantage point, that is not a complete definition/description of a person, deep within ourselves we know that we could not exhaust the knowledge of a person in just a few sentences. The whole life of a person, from birth to death, would constitute the WHOLE DEFINITION OF THAT PERSON, and still, nobody can ever know each and every interaction that person has with others, or with the environment. Again, here synthetic atomization underscores man’s infinite ignorance about another person’s totality, though has a finiteness, is still beyond a person’s comprehension, memory, and knowing, such that sometimes religious people infer an infinite intelligence or Supreme Being that would KNOW a whole person’s life so that there would be SOMEONE who would have a complete definition of a person.
However, despite the voluminous obligation Synthetic Atomization imposes on its application of the definition of a person, a person’s actions meanwhile would be easily judged based on the consequences of his or her actions and its immediate results on others or on objects. This is where Atomization occurs, the result of the act, or the end result of an interaction between objects, would be the atom that unites the actors within the event or reaction between persons and their actions, and that would facilitate judgment of a logical exercise upon a statement or event in time. That judgment is another addition to the synthetic description of an object/person/term’s definition, but their involvement is atomized by their specific effect in that moment in time that would provide direction for perception, awareness, and judgment, for direction is presupposed by the finiteness, or atomization of concepts involved, the melding of concept-groups into a singular concept-group, i.e., the result or consequence.
Thus, a criminal behind bars, convicted justly and within legal bounds of his/her milieu, is adjudged as such for the action committed against humanity, against society. That is the atomization of the action, the doer, the recipient of the action, the time it occurred, how it was done, into the end result: being behind bars, and something more simplified for judgment, that is, bad, as far as the limitation imposed on the felon on freedom and reputation. Nobody would know if he/she would reform, become a saint, what subsequent actions and interactions would occur involving the convict within prison, all of which would comprise his/her the synthesis of being, the totality of existence up to the time of death, the endpoint of existence in the material sense. However, when the judgment is made to bear on a consequence of an action that impinges on the duty of society to take action, then, he or she would be atomized together with others in another exercise of judgment, the conclusion of a logical exercise.
Synthetic Atomization has many applications in the field of logic and philosophizing so much so that it would be the restatement of the obvious as pointed out by prior movements of literature and philosophy, however, delineation of the lines of thought and logical actions would clarify more than obfuscate more than the abstractions offered by logical atomism and idealism that many ideologies have offered earlier generations of credulous students.
Filed under: Literary Criticism, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Psychology, Writing, thoughts , challenging the old schools of thought, direction of thinking, logic, new theory of philosophy, philosophizing, Philosophy, rationalism
